RIP Lane Pryce—you were a fine fellow.
(Source: madmendaily)
In last week’s episode of Mad Men, the spotlight is shining on the three prominent female characters: Joan, Peggy, and Megan—the episode title, “The Other Woman” immediately highlights them since they are the leading ladies and each of them have taken turns being “the other woman.” But, the episode’s story becomes more complicated, as Mad Men always is, and while everyone is busy fussing over how to sell sultry mistresses and sexy cars, the driver is being overlooked.
Enter Don, Stage Left.
Don was the lion tamer, the driver of the sleek, sexy Jaguar. The man steering the vehicles of desire where he wanted, when he wanted. This is how we met him, and how many viewers came to expect him. Slowly, we’ve seen him change, become more tame, domestic even—thanks Megan. Things are changing, and his confidence in the world he knew has been shaken; that world doesn’t really exist anymore. That doubt haunts him throughout this episode and really eats at him in the following, more on that later.
Did SCDP get Jaguar because of Don’s brilliant pitch? Or, did they get it because of Joan’s fabulous tits?
Sorry for the curtity, but that’s how the situation played itself out. It left the audience, and the characters feeling a little jarred, uncomfortable, brows furrowed, feathers ruffled. And that’s how the world was at the time, the mid-1960s, turning back then snapping forward, squinting to make sense of what’s coming ahead, unsure how to proceed but knowing that’s the only way to go.
In this week’s episode, “Commissions and Fees,” Don once again lurks in the periphery. He’s present, but not the center of the story, but his decisions have a huge impact on the outcomes. His moment of regaining his old fire came was after a snarky remark during a partners’ meeting—”should I just leave so you can all go ahead and vote without me”—and a disappointing discovery, which lead to two unfortunate events: Don firing Lane, and Lane’s untimely death.
Exit Don, Stage Right.
Cool, collected, Don is losing control. Things are happening without him—we saw that last week with the vote that Don’s still bitter about. But more than that, his daughter is growing up, Megan is trying out for auditions, his employees are disappearing, and Don can’t do anything about it. His advice goes unheard; his words fall flat; no one is sold on his ideas.

The end of, “Commissions and Fees” is extremely telling for Don’s role as the series and the 60s continues—he’s in the passenger seat now. The younger generation is at the wheel. We see Don letting Glen drive, with a “helpful” (read: hesitant) hand on the wheel, making sure Glen stays on course. But, Don knows, Glen knows, we all know he’s going to have to let go. The question is when.
More time is needed to process this week’s happenings—the symbolism is more plentiful than the liquor in Don’s and Roger’s stash.
Not that I want to overlook the tragedy that befell SCDP with the premature departure of Lane Pryce—may he finally rest in peace—
but, I’m interested in Sally’s development into a not-a-girl-not-yet-a-woman. I’m a gender geek and an academic; it can’t be helped.
Sally, like the decade she’s coming of age in, is stuck in a constant tug-of-war with the traditional and the transitioning. She’s tempted and fascinated by the youthful, rebellious Megan, who seems to encourage Sally to embrace her budding sexuality by exposing her to other older, but still young, vivacious women and normalizing the coming of age process; however, when that sexuality finally shows up—in the form of an uncomfortable, embarrassing, and perhaps painful period—Sally retreats into the familiar arms of her mother. Once in Betty’s embrace, we see Sally, mascara now smeared, go-go boot free, curled up into the fetal position. Her mother whispering her own insecurities about herself and her body, letting her daughter know that her period is a sign that “everything is working ok” and making sure Sally knows that now’s the time when she should begin considering the path ahead of her—Betty’s path—having a baby, starting a family, “when she’s ready.”
That last part is interesting and a little unexpected. Those words subtly imply that Sally can control, somehow, her body and when she starts that family. Maybe Betty is a little more progressive than we give her credit for—she did, if we can remember that far back, stand on her well-manicured front yard, holding a shotgun in her well-manicured hands, a cigarette in her well-lipsticked lips, and shoot a pestering bird out of the sky, which is not a very middle-class, white, suburban housewife thing to do. Betty’s got a few surprises hidden under those dresses and petticoats.
More to come I’m sure. These are just raw, first thoughts.
Mitt Romney’s senior campaign adviser, Eric Fehrnstrom, on Sunday said that social issues important to women, like contraception coverage and abortion rights, were “shiny objects” that were being used to distract voters. […]
“Mitt Romney is pro-life,” the senior adviser admitted to ABC’s George Stephanopoulos. “He’ll govern as a pro-life president, but you’re going to see the Democrats use all sorts of shiny objects to distract people’s attention from the Obama performance on the economy. This is not a social issue election.”
Look. I’ve said this before. There have been plenty of moments in the last 3.5 years where I thought Obama could have done better - much better, in fact - on reproductive rights and reproductive justice.
But the things I have problems with when it comes to Obama are NOT going to be fixed by electing Romney. No way.
Obama 2012
[NB: “Women’s issues” affect more people than just cis women.]
Whenever I see these remarks accusing the Democrats of creating the “war on women” as a way to win votes or for any number of other reasons to make some sort of political statement, my internal response is always the same: No one would be talking about these things if they weren’t there. That means someone put them there, in the front of the public eye to see and respond to.
I’m not usually a very partisan political person—I try to avoid that racket at all costs—but, the Dems aren’t the majority of the legislators introducing and supporting all these pieces of legislation at the state and national level to limit women’s access to health care or more fundamentally restricting women’s decision making ability for themselves and their families. There are some Dems who’ve supported the measures, sure, there are always exceptions. But by and large, these pieces of legislation were drafted, sponsored, and supported by the Republicans who are now denying that there’s an affront on women.
Sorry, but it’s kind of hard to ignore the numbers:
“more than 1,100 reproductive health and rights-related provisions, a sharp increase from the 950 introduced in 2010. By year’s end, 135 of these provisions had been enacted in 36 states, an increase from the 89 enacted in 2010 and the 77 enacted in 2009….Fully 68% of these new provisions—92 in 24 states—-restrict access to abortion services, a striking increase from last year, when 26% of new provisions restricted abortion. The 92 new abortion restrictions enacted in 2011 shattered the previous record of 34 adopted in 2005.”—The Guttmacher Institute
Moral of the story, if you don’t want people to say you’re declaring war, waging war or whatever on women, don’t introduce a bunch of bills that directly and negatively impact women. Especially that close to and during an election year—where are these people’s campaign managers/strategists?
January Jones by Robert Trachtenberg
Another one for Whiskey and Whippedcream. Look at the lady being all fierce ‘n shit.
Piet Mondrian, Composition with Red, Blue and Yellow (unfinished), 1940
She’s a multitasker, that’s what she is. I thought she started the day slow but she picked up the pace.
John Slattery, audio commentary for 2x09 “Six Month Leave”
This is for you, Whiskey and Whipped Cream.
(Source: dreyfus)
Canada’s teen birth and abortion rate drops by 36.9 per cent
Better access to contraception, higher quality sex education and shifting social norms have contributed to a 36.9 per cent decline in Canada’s teen birth and abortion rate between 1996 and 2006, according to a report released today by the Sex Information and Education Council of Canada.
America’s emphasis on abstinence-only sex ed “tends to result in a higher percentage of teens becoming pregnant,” as does the country’s lack of universal health care. Poverty is another factor.
Among the four countries compared for 2006, Canada boasted the lowest teen birth and abortion rate per 1,000 women aged 15 to 19 (27.9), followed by Sweden (31.4), England/Wales (60.3), and the United States (61.2).
JUST SAYING.
These numbers are pretty compelling.